Direkt zum Inhalt | Direkt zur Navigation

Benutzerspezifische Werkzeuge

Sektionen

Gottfried Treviranus Facharzt FMH
Sie sind hier: Startseite / BipoSuisse / For value or for worth (2017)

For value or for worth (2017)

Herein the interdisciplinary neuro-economical theory is presented which allowed me to suggest the first ever mast-cell-driven behavioral experiment to the Ann Kelly lab in Ann Arbor MI through Dr. Shelly Flagel: It was succesfully performed in 2017 (open access: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/am/pii/S0889159117301496). Diese neue Arbeit bringt verschiedenste Forschungsgebiete zum Thema der Aneignungsprozesse und der temperament-gesteuerten Lernvorgänge im Bereich von Absicht und Wahrnehmung zusammen. Hieraus ergeben sich differenziertere Ansichten zur Neuroökonomie, die gegenwärtigen verkürzten Therien widersprechen. Geichzeitig erlaubte sie, das erste, erfolgreich durchgeführte, Verhaltensexperiment mit Mastzellen vorzuschlagen.
File For value or for worth (2017) part 1
For Value or for Worth? Part 1: Speaking Syllogistic Attractors of Appropriations in a Thought-Action-Mood-Space :: the classic Thought-Action-Mood-scheme is expanded using a simple logical interpretation, which within dyn4TAM generates 56 natural language terms denoting specific switches in the Thought-Action-Mood-Space harboring appropriation waves modulated by temperament or anxio-affective disorders.
File For Value or for Worth? Part 2 (2017)
For Value or for Worth? Part 2: A Neuroeconomical Thought-Action-Mood-Space Modulated by (Un-)Certainty as Sign- or Goal-tracking :: The prime human motivating dimension (Un-)Certainty-Orientation determines wither Mood betters or worsens during cognitive effort in the search for always only 4-dimensional abstract models. rats are similar - and mast cells could well be involved in this.
File For value or for worth pt1 & pt2 - one .pdf
Conjoined .pdf-file
Navigation